Author:
Uthmeier Thorsten,Chabai Victor P.,Veselsky Andrey P.
Abstract
AbstractAt Kabazi V, level III/4-2, the entire debris from the manufacture of a bifacial preform was found deposited in a small anthropogenic pit. The bifacial preform itself was missing. The fact that it was possible to refit all larger blanks, as well as several chips, from the pit, whereas refits with artifacts discarded on the surface of the corresponding archeological level were not found, underlines the character of the pit’s contents as a closed find sensu stricto. The only explanation for the presence of chips of very small size from the same nodule, alongside the larger ones, in the pit fill is the use of an apron to collect all detached items during the process of flaking. Among the numerous anthropogenic pits from the Crimean Middle Paleolithic, the one found at Kabazi V, level III/4-2, and two other examples from Zaskalanya V and Zaskalnaya VI stand out for the intentional deposition of carefully selected artifacts in them. The sizes of the pits match the volumes of the artifacts deposited, which emphasizes the close relationship between the construction of the pits and the artifacts’ deposition. This article explores the significance of the three cases of artifact deposition referred to above to our understanding of segmented production processes and of why these depositions occurred. The most evident interpretation is that they were caches of equipment stored as insurance for unforeseen circumstances, which is indicative of substantial planning depth and a recurrent use of logistical territories.
Funder
DFG
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Archaeology,Anthropology,Archaeology
Reference107 articles.
1. Aubry T, Almeida M, Neves MJ, Walter B (2003a) Solutrean laurel leaf point production and raw material procurement during Last Glacial Maximum in Southern Europe: two examples from Central France and Portugal. In: Soressi M, Dibble HL (eds) Multiple approaches to the study of bifacial technologies. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, pp 165–182
2. Aubry T, Peyrouse JB, Walter B (2003b) Les feuilles de laurier de Volgu (Saône-et-Loire): une énigme en partie résolue? Paléo 15:245–250
3. Bader ON, Bader NO (1979) Volchi Grot, some results of investigations. In: Kolosov YG (ed) The investigation of the Paleolithic in Crimea. Naukova Dumka, Kiev, pp 15–33 (in Russian)
4. Bailey G (2007) Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. J Anthropol Archaeol 26:198–223
5. Bataille G (2017) Neanderthals of Crimea—creative generalists of the Late Middle Palaeolithic. Contextualizing the leaf point industry Buran-Kaya III, Level C. Quat Int 435:211–236
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献