Abstract
AbstractCouples are making increasingly varied surname change decisions following marriage. However, despite this increased variability, cultural attitudes toward nontraditional surname choices remain rooted in sexism, with women who retain their maiden names often being viewed negatively as individuals and as partners within their marriages. The present study aimed to examine ambivalent sexism as a potential moderator of the link between women’s and men’s nontraditional surname choices and negative perceptions of those individuals and their marriages. To this end, participants (n = 129) viewed a series of vignettes describing heterosexual couples who made traditional vs. nontraditional choices regarding whether to change or retain their surnames following marriage, and participants’ levels of ambivalent sexism were measured. Results indicated that participants with higher levels of sexism perceived nontraditional surname choices, and the individuals who make those choices, more negatively relative to those who make traditional choices. These findings underscore the persistent role of sexism in cultural attitudes toward marital surname choices in an emerging adult population.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Boxer, D. (2010). Gender, language, and power: Surname or sirname? In S. J. Behrens, & J. A. Parker (Eds.), Language in the real world (pp. 164–179). Routledge.
2. Boxer, D., & Gritsenko, E. (2005). Women and surnames across cultures: Reconstituting identity in marriage. Women and Language, 28(2), 1–11.
3. Brightman, J. (1994). Why Hillary chooses Rodham Clinton. American Demographics, 16, 9–10.
4. Chayinska, M., Ulug, O. M., Solak, N., Kanik, B., & Cuvas, B. (2021). Obstacles to birth surname retention upon marriage: How do hostile sexism and system justification predict support for marital surname change among women? Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702553.
5. Connor, R. A., Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Ambivalent sexism in the twenty-first century. In C. G. Silbey, & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 295–320). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316161579.013.