Insights into Young Adults’ Views on Long-term and Short-term Romantic Relationships in the United Kingdom

Author:

Mengzhen LimORCID,Berezina ElizavetaORCID,Benjamin JaimeORCID

Abstract

AbstractSocial progressions such as the feminist movement and technological advances may have influenced the way young adults perceive romantic relationships. Although long-term relationships are traditionally viewed favorably in society, short-term relationships are becoming more popular in recent years. It’s important to understand the common perceptions of romance among young adults because it affects their partner choices and expectations. While experts can define the concepts of long-term and short-term relationships, we believe the most reliable method is to ask young adults directly. Therefore, we collected data from 229 self-reported British nationals aged between 18 and 33 (M = 19.66; SD = 2.72) to understand their perceptions of long-term and short-term romantic relationships. We asked them to write down the words or phrases that come to mind when they think of these concepts. Using the structural approach of the theory of social representation, we analyzed the values and norms of young British adults regarding these concepts. Based on our study, we observed four important things. Firstly, short-term relationships (STRs) are associated with “fun”, “excitement”, and “passion”, while long-term relationships (LTRs) are associated with “love”, “commitment”, “trust”, and “loyalty”. Secondly, while sex is important in romantic relationships, it’s only a peripheral component of STRs and not a significant factor in LTRs. Thirdly, both those in relationships and single individuals agree that “fling” and “passion” are primary aspects of STRs, but those in relationships tend to use the term “fun,“ while single individuals use “exciting” to describe STRs. Lastly, “love”, “trust”, and “commitment” are essential elements in LTRs for both single individuals and those in relationship. However, individuals in relationships also value loyalty as a critical aspect of romantic relationships.

Funder

Meiji University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference75 articles.

1. Alamsyah, A. A. (2022). Cost and benefit analysis of romantic and casual sexual relationships: a prediction [PhD Thesis]. Alliant International University.

2. Albert, G., Arnocky, S., Puts, D. A., & Hodges-Simeon, C. R. (2021). Can listeners assess men’s self-reported health from their voice? Evolution and human behavior, 42(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.08.001

3. Anastasia, O., Ganna, T., & Austin, D. (2020). The English William and Catherine Rose and wedding of the century (p. 52). EDITORIAL BOARD.

4. Atay, Ş. (2021). Psychological aggression among dating university students: The prediction of attachment styles, rejection sensitivity, and self-compassion [Master’s Thesis]. Middle East Technical University.

5. Azzahra, R., & Suhadi, M. F. (2021). Toxic relationship in Anna Todd’s Wattpad story after. Journal of Language, 3(2), 166–176.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3