ASEAN Four’s middle income trap dilemma: evidence of the middle technology trap

Author:

Ke YianORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn Southeast Asia, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines are defined by the World Bank as countries that failed to overcome the "middle income trap". The four Southeast Asian countries (hereinafter referred to as the "ASEAN Four") entered the ranks of middle-income economies in the late 1970s and early 1980s and achieved rapid economic development throughout the 1980s and 1990s. However, since the early 2000s, the competitive advantages of these countries’ labor-intensive industries have started to decline, while the process of industrial transformation and technological improvement has been stagnated due to the lack of innovation resources. With limited R&D input and insufficient indigenous tech innovation, these countries’ manufacturing industry show a trend of "deindustrialization" and the "middle technology trap" phenomenon emerged. As the manufacturing sector failed to generate value-added that promotes economic growth and national income increase, ASEAN Four have so far yet to enter the high-income ranks. Drawing from the cases of ASEAN Four, this paper argues that the "middle technology trap" is a key contributing factor to the “middle income trap,” and countries fallen into the “middle income trap” often experience the "middle technology trap" as a concomitant phenomenon. The paper first introduces the industrialization process of ASEAN Four while analyzes the challenges they faced in industrial structural transformation and technology advancement. It then discusses major reasons that these countries failed to step over both the "middle technology trap" and the “middle income trap”, including limited technology spillovers from FDI, R&D investment shortages and insufficient industrial policies, low-quality education system, deficient intellectual property protection and underdeveloped regional capital markets. The paper concludes with some implications for China and discussion on potential future research on distinctions of the “middle technology trap” phenomenon between upper middle-income and lower middle-income countries.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference31 articles.

1. Chen, Minghua. 2000. Shixi Feilübin chukou daoxiangxing gongyehua fazhan zhanlüe (Try to analyze the Philippine export-oriented industrialization development strategy). Dongnanya Yanjiu (Southeast Asian Studies) (1): 21–24+28.

2. Dutta, Soumitra, Bruno Lanvin, Lorena Rivera Leon, and Sacha Wunsch-Vincent. 2022. Global innovation index 2022: What is the future of innovation-driven growth? 15th ed. Genava: WIPO.

3. Eichengreen, Barry, Donghyun Park, and Kwanho Shin. 2013. Growth slowdowns redux: New evidence on the Middle-Income Trap. NBER Working Paper Series: 18673.

4. Felipe, Jesus. 2012. Tracking the Middle-Income Trap: What is it, who is in it, and why? Part 2. ADB Economics Working Paper Series: 307.

5. Fink, Carsten, and Keith E Maskus. 2005. Intellectual property and development: Lessons from recent economic research. Washington, DC: World Bank and London: Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3