Abstract
AbstractThe Internet-of-Things (IoT) triggers data protection questions and new types of cyber risks. Cyber risk regulations for the IoT, however, are still in their infancy. This is concerning, because companies integrating IoT devices and services need to perform a self-assessment of its IoT cyber security posture. At present, there are no self-assessment methods for quantifying IoT cyber risk posture. It is considered that IoT represent a complex system with too many uncontrollable risk states for quantitative risk assessment. To enable quantitative risk assessment of uncontrollable risk states in complex and coupled IoT systems, a new epistemological equation is designed and tested though comparative and empirical analysis. The comparative analysis is conducted on national digital strategies, followed by an empirical analysis of cyber risk assessment approaches. The results from the analysis present the current and a target state for IoT systems, followed by a transformation roadmap, describing how IoT systems can achieve the target state with a new epistemological analysis model. The new epistemological analysis approach enables the assessment of uncontrollable risk states in complex IoT systems—which begin to resemble artificial intelligence—and can be used for a quantitative self-assessment of IoT cyber risk posture.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Cisco Systems
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Woodsmall, W. (1989). Cybernetic epistemology. Next Step Press.
2. Abu-Shaqra, B. (2020). Technoethics and Sensemaking: Risk Assessment and Knowledge Management of Ethical Hacking in a Sociotechnical Society. PhD diss., University of Ottawa.
3. Whyte, C. (2018). Crossing the digital divide: monism, dualism and the reason collective action is critical for cyber theory production. Politics and Governance, 6(2), 73–82.
4. Resnyansky, L. (2019). Conceptual frameworks for social and cultural Big Data analytics: Answering the epistemological challenge. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 2053951718823815.
5. Ormerod, O. (2021). Michael Polanyi and the epistemology of intelligence analysis. Intelligence and National Security, 36(3), 377–391.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献