Abstract
AbstractProviding safe and informed healthcare for sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals with cancer is stymied by the lack of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data reliably available in health records and by insufficient training for staff. Approaches that support institutional learning, especially around sensitive topics, are essential for hospitals seeking to improve practices impacting patient safety and research. We engineered annual institutional retreats to identify and unify stakeholders, promote awareness of gaps and needs, identify initiatives, minimize redundant projects, and coordinate efforts that promote improvements in SGM cancer care, education, and research. The 2022 and 2023 retreats employed a 4-h hybrid format allowing virtual and in-person engagement. Retreat organizers facilitated small-group discussions for brainstorming among participants. We performed descriptive statistics from retreat evaluations. The retreats engaged 104 attendees from distinct departments and roles. Participants expressed robust satisfaction, commending the retreat organization and content quality. Notably, the first retreat yielded leadership endorsement and funding for a Quality Improvement pilot to standardize SOGI data collection and clinical staff training. The second retreat provided a platform for updates on focused efforts across the institution and for receiving direction regarding national best practices for SGM care and research. We report the processes and outcomes of institution-wide retreats, which served as a platform for identifying gaps in organizational healthcare practices and research for SGM individuals with cancer. The strategies described herein may be readily scaled at other cancer hospitals seeking to learn and enact system-wide practice changes that support the needs of SGM patients and families.
Funder
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference11 articles.
1. National Institutes of Health. "NIH Director’s Message for March 11, 2022." NIMHD, 11 Mar. 2022, www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-funded-nasem-report-highlights-critical-need-sgm-related-data-collection. Accessed 23 Jul 2022
2. Domogauer J, Cantor T, Quinn G, Stasenko M (2022) Disparities in cancer screenings for sexual and gender minorities. Curr Probl Cancer 46(5):100858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2022.100858
3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division of behavioral and social sciences and education; committee on national statistics; committee on measuring sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation; Becker T, Chin M, Bates N, editors. Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation. National Academies Press; 2022 Mar 9. PMID: 35286054.
4. Kamen CS, Pratt-Chapman ML, Meersman SC, Quinn GP, Schabath MB, Maingi S, Merrill JK, Garrett-Mayer E, Kaltenbaugh M, Schenkel C, Chang S (2022) Sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in oncology practice: findings of an ASCO survey. JCO Oncol Pract 18(8):e1297–e1305. https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.22.00084
5. Cahill S, Makadon HJ (2014) Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection Update: U.S. Government Takes Steps to Promote Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection Through Meaningful Use Guidelines. LGBT Health 1(3):157–160. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2014.0033