Abstract
AbstractAnalyses and assessments of hazards occurring in work processes are carried out by teams, in which there is usually one representative of the personnel, as the embodiment of the active participation of employees in the assessment of occupational risks. This is why the article presents research on all employees’ knowledge and awareness about risks in their work environment. The research was carried out in the form of an employee survey in one of the open-pit mines, at workstations dealing with the loading and transporting of excavated material. The survey included a list of 40 hazards divided into four groups: (1) hazards related to machines and equipment used, (2) hazards related to exposure, (3) hazards with an impact extending beyond the workstation and (4) hazards of an ergonomic nuisance nature, where employees were required to indicate which hazards apply to their workplaces and determine their level of significance, probability of occurrence and the scale of possible effects. In this way, a hierarchical identification of threats occurring at the analyzed workplaces was made, and the obtained results were used to determine the amount of occupational risk both for specific workstations and for the whole technological process. The measures of the magnitude of occupational risk obtained using the proposed method have showed that, according to the respondents, greatest risks at the workstation are associated with moving machines and vehicles and with mobile equipment. Equally important risks, which were often mentioned by employees, were those directly related to their health, i.e., related to ergonomic nuisance and exposure. Threats resulting from geological and mining conditions, considered typical for mining, were important for the surveyed miners but they were not the most important owing to proper prevention, good organization of work and high safety culture The active involvement of the crew in the process of assessing occupational hazards allowed to identify the significance of each hazard, in the opinion of the personnel working at various places and to use this ranking for determining occupational risk levels in the mining company concerned. The research has also outlined another goal to be achieved: a comparison of the relative significance of hazards identified by the employees and of the hazards listed in occupational risk assessment matrices used by mines.
Funder
Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza im. Stanislawa Staszica
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference24 articles.
1. Act of June 26, 1974; Labor Code. Dz.U. no 24, poz.141, - Dz.U. 2020.1320 Regulation of the Minister of Labor and Social Policy of September 26, 1997 on general provisions on health and safety at work. Dz.U.03.169.1650
2. Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1989/391/2008-12-11)
3. Dzeng RJ, Lin CT, Fang YC (2016) Using eye-tracker to compare search patterns between experienced and novice workers for site hazard identification. Saf Sci 82:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.08.008
4. Gajdowska M, Ramiącek P (2019) Współczesne wyzwania bezpieczeństwa wewnętrznego, pp 181–183, Kielce-Tarnobrzeg
5. Karczewski J (2020) Systemy Zarządzania Bezpieczeństwem i Higieną Pracy, Akademia EVISA, wykład czerwiec
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献