Abstract
AbstractDimensions and mutual relationships amongst fracture (cleat) parameters such as maximum aperture width, average aperture width, length, spacing etc. control the connectivity within a fracture network and the fluid flow in a coal seam as the matrix permeability, here, is negligible. In this paper, we document cleat size distributions and investigate length–aperture relationships from coals of Raniganj coalfield in Eastern India. This coalfield has a proven extractable reserve of six billion tons of coal and holds immense potential to be one of the largest coal bed methane fields serving India’s growing energy needs. Here, cleat length (L) correlates with corresponding maximum aperture width (Dmax) in a power-law function with an exponent of 0.84 (Dmax α L0.84) instead of the commonly observed exponents of 1 or 0.5 applicable for other natural ‘opening-mode’ fractures. The conventional wisdom pertains that laminar fluid flow (Q) through an isolated, smooth-walled, parallel-plate fracture, embedded in an impermeable matrix, is directly proportional to the cube of its aperture width (b, equivalent to Davg; cubic law: Q α b3). This assumes a linear relationship between length and fracture aperture. However, the modified relationship between cleat length and average aperture width changes the cubic law applicable for Raniganj coal seam and now fluid flow correlates with aperture width in a power-law function with an exponent of 4.25 (Q α b4.25) instead of 3 (cube). Such simplifications will come handy for the modeling and estimation of fluid flow as it will reduce the effort of cleat length measurement which is anyway difficult and can be misleading due to the risk of undersampling.
Funder
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference84 articles.
1. Alzayer Y, Eichhubl P, Laubach SE (2015) Non-linear growth kinematics of opening-mode fractures. J Struct Geol 74:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2015.02.003
2. Ammosov II, Eremin IV (1963) Fracturing in coal. IZDAT Publishers, Moscow
3. Apriyani N, Suharmono M, Djaelani S, Sodli A, Satria A, Murtani AS (2014) Integrated cleat analysis and coal quality on CBM exploration at Sangatta II PSC, Kutai Basin, Indonesia. In: AAPG international conference & exhibition, Istanbul, Turkey, September 14–17
4. Aydin A, Borja RI, Eichhubl P (2006) Geological and mathematical framework for failure modes in granular rock. J Struct Geol 28:83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2005.07.008
5. Benedicto A, Schultz R, Soliva R (2003) Layer thickness and the shape of faults. Geophys Res Lett 30:2076. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl018237
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献