The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance a reply to Braun, Glänzel and Schubert
Author:
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications,General Social Sciences
Link
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02017524.pdf
Reference58 articles.
1. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, ‘Assessing assessments of British science: some facts and figures to accept or decline’,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 165–170.
2. B.R. Martin, J. Irvine, F. Narin, C. Sterritt, The continuing decline of British science’Nature, 320 (1987) 123–126.
3. Quite what epistemological assumptionsBraun et al. are making in putting forward the notion of “the correct proof” we leave for others to speculate. Suffice it to say that it is not a concept to which we adhere. Furthermore, in all our analyses of research performance, we have always stressed the imperfect or partial nature of bibliometric indicators, and the fact that they can only be used to suggest (rather than to “prove”) certain conclusions. For example, seeB.R. Martin, J. Irvine, ‘Assessing basic research: some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy’,Research Policy, 12 (1983) 61–90.
4. Braun et al.,op. cit. note 1 ‘ 165.
5. Ibid. 170.
Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Short-term incentives of research evaluations: Evidence from the UK Research Excellence Framework;Research Policy;2023-07
2. Examining national citation impact by comparing developments in a fixed and a dynamic journal set;Scientometrics;2019-03-16
3. The positive side of discursive disagreements in the social sciences;Journal of Informetrics;2017-11
4. The normalization of co-authorship networks in the bibliometric evaluation: the government stimulation programs of China and Korea;Scientometrics;2016-07-09
5. World shares of publications of the USA, EU-27, and China compared and predicted using the new Web of Science interface versus Scopus;El Profesional de la Informacion;2012-01-01
1.学者识别学者识别
2.学术分析学术分析
3.人才评估人才评估
"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370
www.globalauthorid.com
TOP
Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司 京公网安备11010802033243号 京ICP备18003416号-3