The Consequences of Defending DNA Statistics-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Consequences of Defending DNA Statistics

Published:2000 Issue: Volume: Page:87-97
ISSN:
Container-title:Statistical Science in the Courtroom
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Weir B. S.

Publisher

Springer New York

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-1-4612-1216-4_5

Reference58 articles.

1. Balding, D.J. and R.A. Nichols. 1994. DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Science International 64:125–140.

2. Berry, D.A. 1992. Statistical issues in DNA identification, Billings(ed.) DNA On Trial,Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

3. Buckleton, J.S., I.W. Even, and B.S. Weir. 1998. Setting bounds for the likelihood ratio when multiple hypotheses are postulated. Science and Justice 38:23–26.

4. Curran, J.M., C.M. Triggs, J.S. Buckleton, and B.S. Weir. 1999. Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations. Journal of Forensic Sciences 44: 44:987–995

5. Evett, I.W., C. Buffery, G. Willott, and D. Stoney. 1991. A guide to interpreting single locus profiles of DNA mixtures in forensic cases. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 31:41–47.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. This Isn’t CSI;Criminal Justice Policy Review;2006-03

2. Statistical aspects of interpreting DNA profiling in legal cases;Statistica Neerlandica;2003-08

3. On the ethical aspects of the testimony of statisticians in court;Statistical Methods in Medical Research;2002-10

4. Statistical Genetics and Genetical Statistics: a Forensic Perspective*;Scandinavian Journal of Statistics;2002-06