Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Effectiveness of Stand-Alone Digital Suicide Preventive Interventions for the Self-Management of Suicidality

Author:

Sutori SaraORCID,Hadlaczky GergöORCID,Eliasson EmmaORCID,Wasserman DanutaORCID,Carli VladimirORCID

Abstract

AbstractSuicide is a global issue accounting for more than 700,000 deaths annually, with low- and middle-income countries being disproportionally affected. Technology-enhanced interventions have been suggested as a preventive method with various benefits—e.g., increased scalability and sustainability, making them relevant for developed and especially for developing nations. However, despite the increasing number of such interventions, their effectiveness is seldom appropriately evaluated. The current review aims to tackle this need by synthetizing the evidence with the goal of answering whether these interventions can be recommended for the self-management of suicidality. A systematic review was carried out across multiple databases (PubMed/Medline, Global Index Medicus, PsychINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), identifying 4520 individual reports up to November 2021. Ten of these were deemed sufficient to inform the evaluation, but only four were included in the meta-analyses. Quality assessment via GRADE reveals some concerns, primarily regarding selection of reported results. Results suggest negligible effect on the outcomes of deaths by suicide, suicide attempts, and a small effect on suicidal ideation—favoring digital interventions over no intervention. Conclusively, there is not enough evidence to allow for the recommendation of digital interventions as stand-alone care, but they are promising if developed on the grounds of evidence-based practices. The review also highlights the challenges of evaluation, by discussing excessive safety procedures and considering parallelly ongoing treatment. Additionally, the need to involve low- and middle-income countries is emphasized as currently these regions are underrepresented, even though they have a high potential for benefiting from stand-alone digital interventions.

Funder

Karolinska Institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Human-Computer Interaction,Applied Psychology,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3