Abstract
AbstractThe article applies the economic theory of alliances to uncover military expenditure burden sharing in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) during 1991–2020, prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. In so doing, our analysis accounts for the relative locations of NATO allies through various spatial or economic weights applied to the allies’ defense spending. Such weights include NATO membership status, contiguity, US power projection, inverse distance between members’ capitals, economic trade, and contiguity to Russia. In the post-Cold War era, we uncover allies’ free riding on the aggregate military expenditure of other allies. Free riding also included reliance on the defense spending of NATO allies in proximity to Russia. Surprisingly, NATO allies reduced their defense spending as Russia increased its defense spending. The pattern of free riding and lack of response to heightened Russian defense spending likely encouraged the Russian invasion as NATO appeared divided.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management,Economics and Econometrics
Reference61 articles.
1. Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1996). The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press
2. Correlates of War Project (2006). Direct Contiguity Data, 1816–2006, Version 3.1. Retrieved from https://correlatesofwar.org/
3. Dudley, L., & Montmarquette, C. (1981). The demand for military expenditures: An international comparison. Public Choice, 37(1), 5–31
4. Dunne, J. P., & Perlo-Freeman, S. (2003). The demand for military spending in developing countries. International Review of Applied Economics, 17(1), 23–48
5. Elhorst, J. P. (2003). Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. International Regional Science Review, 26(3), 244–268
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献