Abstract
AbstractThe aim of this paper is to use network analysis as a monitoring tool for the competitive conditions and the behavior of the contracting authorities and companies in the public procurement market. The proposed method examines the market using network entropy and conditional network entropy, along with each agent's metrics. Network entropy offers information about the market conditions for the authorities and companies’ groups. The conditional network entropy measures the distribution of contracts across sellers or buyers for each group. The findings are signals of possible dominant positions and preferential treatment. In the second stage, the agency uses the agents’ degrees and entropies, unweighted and weighted, to inspect for possible preferential treatment or market dominance by specific agents. We applied the method in the pacemakers’ public procurement market using data from 33 countries from the period 2009–2019. The findings indicated that even though the network entropy and the conditional network entropy indicated that the market operated competitively, the examination of the companies’ degree centrality reveals the presence of at least one dominant company.
Funder
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management,Economics and Econometrics
Reference23 articles.
1. Adam, I., Fazekas, M. (2020). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence, Government Transparency Institute Budapest Hungary working paper series: GTI-WP/2020:02, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27658.62406.
2. Ashraf, A., Shaharudin, A. (2020). Open government data: Principles, benefits and evaluations, Khazanah Research Institute discussion paper 12/20.
3. Bader, A. A. (2015). Decision support system and knowledge-based strategic management. Procedia Computer Science, 65, 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.079
4. Baranek, B. (2020). Quality of governance and the design of public procurement, at: https://brunobaranek.com/data/image/full/jmp_recent.pdf . Accessed 22 Jan 2020
5. Bof, F., Casella, G. (2015). Public e-procurement as a key-impact factor in the UE welfare context-The Italian public e-markets: Research findings and E-solutions analysis. In: 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, pp. 1434–1443.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献