Abstract
AbstractResponsibly managing research data has become increasingly important for researchers, especially within the database research community. Despite significant progress in best practices, the state-of-the-art in research data storage is lacking from a legal perspective. We introduce the stakeholders and the dynamic nature of their relationships (such as researchers changing affiliation) and observe that no existing infrastructure for research data storage fully meets their requirements. Therefore, we emphasize the need to design a comprehensive system architecture for research data storage that is aligned with legal considerations from the start, rather than as an afterthought.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. Athanassoulis M, Triantafillou P, Appuswamy R, Bordawekar R, Chandramouli B, Cheng X, Manolescu I, Papakonstantinou Y, Tatbul N (2022) Artifacts availability & reproducibility (VLDB 2021 round table). Sigmod Rec 51(2):74–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3552490.3552511
2. Heil BJ, Hoffman MM, Markowetz F, Lee S-I, Greene CS, Hicks SC (2021) Reproducibility standards for machine learning in the life sciences. Nat Methods 18(10):1132–1135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01256-7
3. Arisi M (2022) Open knowledge. Access and re-use of research data in the European Union open data directive and the implementation in Italy. Tex Intellect Prop Law J 8:33–37
4. Study on the open data directive, data governance and data act and their possible impact on research. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a313139b-1147-11ed-8fa0-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Accessed 2024-04-11
5. Eechoud M (2023) FAIR, FRAND and open-the institutionalization of research data sharing under the EU data strategy. In: Improving intellectual property. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, pp 319–329