Methods of Political Influence of Weak Interests Using the Example of the Reform Process of the Bundesteilhabegesetz (Federal Participation Act)

Author:

Schultz LauraORCID

Abstract

AbstractPeople with disabilities and their associations should have the opportunity to participate in decision-making processes by following the principle of “nothing about us without us,” according to the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. This slogan was pursued as part of the reform process of the Federal Participation Act (Bundesteilhabegesetz) in Germany. Interest groups of people with disabilities (also referred to as “weak interests” in reference to association research) were intensively involved in various stages of the process. This article is based on results of a dissertation project that involved the process tracing method of the reform process of this new law. This paper takes a closer look at the methods of political influence used by interest groups of people with disabilities. Which activities were particularly effective in the context of the process considered here? What can other interest groups learn from the reform process of the Federal Participation Act about the direct use of power resources and lobbying? The power resource approach adapted to weak interests provides a basis, as do various lobbying activities, for demonstrating different ways in which weak interests influence the reform process. As the paper will show, the mix of different lobbying activities helped to assert some of their demands.

Funder

Hochschule Düsseldorf University of Applied Sciences

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference45 articles.

1. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales. (2014). Protokoll der konstituierenden Sitzung der Arbeitsgruppe Bundesteilhabegesetz. 1. Sitzung am 10. Juli 2014a. Retrieved December 3, 2022, from https://www.gemeinsam-einfach-machen.de/GEM/DE/AS/Umsetzung_BTHG/1_Sitzung/1_sitzung_protokoll.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4

2. Callus, A. -M., & Camilleri-Zahra, A. (2017). Nothing about us without us: Disabled people determining their human rights through the UNCRPD. Retrieved December 3, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321825985_Nothing_about_us_without_us%27_disabled_people_determining_their_human_rights_through_the_UNCRPD

3. Clement, U. (2010). Public Governance und schwache Interessen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

4. der Tagesspiegel. (2016). Protest gegen Bundesteilhabegesetz für Behinderte. Rollstuhlfahrer ketten sich am Reichstagsufer an. Retrieved December 3, 2022, from https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/protest-gegen-bundesteilhabegesetz-fuer-behinderte-rollstuhlfahrer-ketten-sich-am-reichstagsufer-an/13583484.html

5. Deutscher Behindertenrat. (2013). Positionspapier des Deutschen Behindertenrates zur Schaffung eines Bundesleistungsgesetzes. Retrieved December 3, 2022, from http://www.teilhabegesetz.org/media/Ottmars_Dateien/130924_DBR_Positionspapier_Bundesleistungsgesetz.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3