Author:
Wangler Julian,Jansky Michael
Abstract
SummaryMedical guidelines aim to ensure that care processes take place in an evidence-based and structured manner. They are especially relevant in outpatient primary care due to the wide range of symptoms and clinical pictures. In German-speaking countries, there is a lack of current findings documenting general practitioners’ opinions and experiences regarding guidelines, their expectations and their views on what improvements could be made to increase the use of this type of evidence-based instrument in the primary care setting. Between April and August 2020, a total of 3098 general practitioners were surveyed in the states of Baden–Württemberg, Hesse and Rhineland–Palatinate via an online questionnaire. Alongside the descriptive evaluation, t‑testing was used to determine significant differences between two independent sampling groups. A factor analysis was also used to cluster the expectations of those surveyed regarding the fulfilment of requirements relating to guidelines. A total of 52% of those surveyed have a positive view of guidelines. Overall, guidelines are associated with an increased evidence-based approach (69%), standardisation of diagnosis and treatment (62%) and a reduction in overprovision or underprovision of care (57%). In all, 62% of the physicians who implemented guidelines observed positive effects on the quality of care provided, and 67% reported that the implementation of guidelines improved the quality of their diagnostic or therapeutic skills. However, implementation is often seen as being complicated (43%) and restricting the physician’s ability to act independently (63%). Survey participants suggested that guidelines could be optimised by giving greater consideration to nondrug alternatives (46%), focusing on issues related to quality of life (42%) and offering a comparative assessment of various treatment options (39%). In order to further promote the attractiveness of guidelines for primary care the design of guidelines should be oriented more towards their application; they should be well-presented to make them easier to implement. The scope of action available to the physician should be stressed. The guidelines should provide recommendations on opportunities for the delegation of tasks within practice teams.
Funder
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Vollmar HC, Oemler M, Schmiemann G, et al. Einschätzung von Hausärzten zu Leitlinien, Fortbildung und Delegation [Assessment of general practitioners on guidelines, further training and delegation. Z Allg Med. 2013;89:23–30.
2. Bodenheimer T. The American health care system—the movement for improved quality in health care. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:488–92.
3. Ollenschlaeger G, Kirchner H, Fiene M. Leitlinien in der Medizin – scheitern sie an der praktischen Umsetzung? [Medical guidelines—do they fail because of practical implementation?]. Internist. 2001;42:473–83.
4. Europarat. Entwicklung einer Methodik für die Ausarbeitung von Leitlinien für optimale medizinische Praxis. Empfehlung Rec (2001) 13 des Europarates. [Creating a methodology for the development of guidelines for best medical practice. Council of Europe Recommendation Rec (2001) 13]. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2002;96:1–60.
5. Wangler J, Pillath S, Jansky M. Significance and potential of diagnostic algorithms in primary care. Results of a survey among hessian family physicians. Z Allg Med. 2019;95:132–7.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献