Pavel Florensky’s Theory of Religious Antinomies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Pavel Florensky’s Theory of Religious Antinomies

Published:2019-11 Issue:4 Volume:13 Page:515-540
ISSN:1661-8297
Container-title:Logica Universalis
language:en
Short-container-title:Log. Univers.

Author:

Rojek Paweł^ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Pavel Florensky (1882–1937), a Russian theologian, philosopher, and mathematician, argued that the religious discourse is essentially contradictory and put forward the idea of the logical theory of antinomies. Recently his views raised interesting discussions among logicians who consider him a forerunner of many non-classical logics. In this paper I discuss four interpretations of Florensky’s views: paraconsistent, L-contradictory, non-monotonic and rhetorical. In conclusion I argue for the integral interpretation which unites these four approaches.

Funder

Jagiellonian University in Krakow

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Logic

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11787-019-00234-0.pdf

Reference49 articles.

1. Antipenko, L.G.: PA Florenskii o logicheskom i simvolicheskom aspektakh nauchno-filosofskogo myshleniia. Kanon-Plius, Moscow (2012)

2. Arruda, A.I.: Aspects of the historical development of paraconsistent logic. In: Priest, G., Routley, R., Norman, J. (eds.) Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, pp. 99–130. Philosophia, München (1989)

3. Arruda, A.I.: NA Vasil’ev: a forerunner of paraconsistent logic. Philos. Nat. 21, 472–491 (1984)

4. Asenjo, F.G.: A calculus of antinomies. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 7, 103–105 (1966)

5. Bazhanov, V.A.: The dawn of paraconsistency: Russia’s logical thought in the turn of XX century. Manuscrito 34, 89–98 (2011)

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Analytic patristics;Studies in East European Thought;2024-01-15

2. What is in a name? Does the difference between onto-theology and theo-ontology direct the way from eco-theology to theo-ecology? Specific Russian theological perspectives;Verbum et Ecclesia;2022-01-13

3. Piekący problemat Ingardena. Platonizm, uniwersalia i byty relacyjne;Filozofia Nauki;2021-10-25

4. Ontologia Romana Ingardena wobec sporu o uniwersalia. W związku z książką Pawła Rojka „Tropy i uniwersalia”;Filozofia Nauki;2021-10-25

5. The logic of antinomy in religious discourse: Pavel Florensky’s meta-language of theology, science and art;HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies;2021-07-29