Author:
Butler Anna,Meijer Lisethe,Liu Jo-Fen,Chohan Manjit,Jalloh Ibrahim,Macarthur Donald,Parr Margaret,Wilne Sophie,Wilson Shaun,Walker David,Grundy Richard,Dandapani Madhumita
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of the project was to evaluate intra-CSF etoposide administration in a palliative setting for children and young people with relapsed/refractory central nervous system (CNS) tumours, with the primary endpoints being overall survival and progression-free survival time. A safety endpoint was to assess the side effect profile and complications of intra-CSF etoposide.
Methods
Thirty-five patients under the age of 30 years (median age: 5.33 years) were enrolled onto the project. The cross-centre study was a service evaluation, with a data collection spreadsheet designed in Nottingham and completed by both Nottingham and Oxford centres. Data was analysed using SPSS, assessing the overall survival and progression-free survival times, as well as the 6-month and 1-year survival rates.
Results
The median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 10.97 and 5.91 months, respectively. The 6-month and 1-year overall survival rates were 67% and 48%, and the progression-free survival rates were 50% and 22%. Age at the start of intra-CSF therapy was significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.046), with the 6 + age group having improved overall survival. Treatment type was significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.012), with etoposide intra-CSF treatment being associated with improved overall survival. Treatment duration was significantly associated with both overall survival (P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Intra-CSF etoposide treatment has shown to increase both overall and progression-free survival significantly, whilst having few side effects and maintaining a good quality of life for patients, reflecting it as a beneficial therapy in the palliative setting.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neurology (clinical),General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference18 articles.
1. Office for National Statistics (2018) Child and infant mortality in England and Wales: 2016. Accessed 22 Aug 2022. Available via: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/childhoodinfantandperinatalmortalityinenglandandwales/2016
2. Ray GL, Buchsbaum JC, McMullen KP, Simoneaux RV, Hines M, Douglas JG, Johnstone PAS (2013) Definitive treatment of leptomeningeal spinal metastases in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:1839–1841. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24659
3. Brower JV, Saha S, Rosenburg SA, Hullett CR, Robins HI (2016) Management of leptomeningeal metastases: prognostic factors and associated outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 27:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.11.012
4. Leal T, Chang JE, Mehta M, Robins HI (2011) Leptomeningeal metastasis: challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Curr Cancer Ther Rev 7:319–327. https://doi.org/10.2174/157339411797642597
5. Chamberlain MC (1997) Pediatric leptomeningeal metastases: outcome following combined therapy. J Child Neurol 12:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/088307389701200109
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Etoposide;Reactions Weekly;2024-07-20