Abstract
AbstractApplying at the economic optimal nitrogen rate (EONR) has the potential to increase nitrogen (N) fertilization efficiency and profits while reducing negative environmental impacts. On-farm precision experimentation (OFPE) provides the opportunity to collect large amounts of data to estimate the EONR. Machine learning (ML) methods such as generalized additive models (GAM) and random forest (RF) are promising methods for estimating yields and EONR. Twenty OFPE N trials in wheat and barley were conducted and analyzed with soil, terrain and remote-sensed variables to address the following objectives: (1) to quantify the spatial variability of winter crops yield and the yield response to N using OFPE, (2) to evaluate and compare the performance of GAM and RF models to predict yield and yield response to N and, (3) to quantify the impact of soil, crop and field characteristics on the EONR estimation. Machine learning techniques were able to model wheat and barley yield with an average error of 13.7% (624 kg ha−1). However, similar yield prediction accuracy from RF and GAM resulted in widely different economic optimal nitrogen rates. Across sites, soil available phosphorus and soil organic matter were the most influential variables; however, the magnitude and direction of the effect varied between fields. These indicate that training a model using data coming from different fields may lead to unreliable site-specific EONR when it is applied to another field. Further evaluation of ML methods is needed to ensure a robust automation of N recommendation while producers transition into the digital ag era.
Funder
Natural Resources Conservation Service
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference67 articles.
1. Archontoulis, S. V., Castellano, M. J., Licht, M. A., Nichols, V., Baum, M., Huber, I., Martinez-Feria, R., Puntel, L., Ordóñez, R. A., Iqbal, J., & Wright, E. E. (2020). Predicting crop yields and soil-plant nitrogen dynamics in the US Corn Belt. Crop Science, 60(2), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20039
2. Bachmaier, M., & Gandorfer, M. (2009). A conceptual framework for judging the precision agriculture hypothesis with regard to site-specific nitrogen application. Precision Agriculture, 10(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9069-x
3. Barbieri, P. A., Rozas, H. S., & Echeverría, H. (2008). Time of nitrogen application affects nitrogen use efficiency of wheat in the humid pampas of Argentina. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 88(5), 849–857.
4. Bolsa de Cereales. (2020). Relevamiento de Tecnología Agrícola Aplicada (ReTAA)(Applied Technologycal Survey) Retrieved December 2021, from https://www.bolsadecereales.com/tecnologia-informes
5. Bullock, D. G., Bullock, D. S., Nafziger, E. D., Doerge, T. A., Paszkiewicz, S. R., Carter, P. R., et al. (1998). Does variable rate seeding of corn pay? Agronomy Journal, 90(6), 830–836. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000060019x
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献