Crop stress detection from UAVs: best practices and lessons learned for exploiting sensor synergies
-
Published:2024-08-11
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1385-2256
-
Container-title:Precision Agriculture
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Precision Agric
Author:
Chakhvashvili ErekleORCID, Machwitz Miriam, Antala Michal, Rozenstein Offer, Prikaziuk Egor, Schlerf Martin, Naethe Paul, Wan Quanxing, Komárek Jan, Klouek Tomáš, Wieneke Sebastian, Siegmann Bastian, Kefauver Shawn, Kycko Marlena, Balde Hamadou, Paz Veronica Sobejano, Jimenez-Berni Jose A., Buddenbaum Henning, Hänchen Lorenz, Wang Na, Weinman Amit, Rastogi Anshu, Malachy Nitzan, Buchaillot Maria-Luisa, Bendig Juliane, Rascher Uwe
Abstract
Introduction
Detecting and monitoring crop stress is crucial for ensuring sufficient and sustainable crop production. Recent advancements in unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) technology provide a promising approach to map key crop traits indicative of stress. While using single optical sensors mounted on UAVs could be sufficient to monitor crop status in a general sense, implementing multiple sensors that cover various spectral optical domains allow for a more precise characterization of the interactions between crops and biotic or abiotic stressors. Given the novelty of synergistic sensor technology for crop stress detection, standardized procedures outlining their optimal use are currently lacking.
Materials and methods
This study explores the key aspects of acquiring high-quality multi-sensor data, including the importance of mission planning, sensor characteristics, and ancillary data. It also details essential data pre-processing steps like atmospheric correction and highlights best practices for data fusion and quality control.
Results
Successful multi-sensor data acquisition depends on optimal timing, appropriate sensor calibration, and the use of ancillary data such as ground control points and weather station information. When fusing different sensor data it should be conducted at the level of physical units, with quality flags used to exclude unstable or biased measurements. The paper highlights the importance of using checklists, considering illumination conditions and conducting test flights for the detection of potential pitfalls.
Conclusion
Multi-sensor campaigns require careful planning not to jeopardise the success of the campaigns. This paper provides practical information on how to combine different UAV-mounted optical sensors and discuss the proven scientific practices for image data acquisition and post-processing in the context of crop stress monitoring.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft European Cooperation in Science and Technology Ministry of Agriculture, Viticulture and Rural Development, BioVIM projectfür Ländliche Entwicklung, Umwelt und Landwirtschaft des Landes Brandenburg Chief Scientist of the Israel Ministry of Agriculture Project Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference125 articles.
1. Aasen, H., & Bolten, A. (2018). Multi-temporal high-resolution imaging spectroscopy with hyperspectral 2D imagers—From theory to application. Remote Sensing of Environment, 205, 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.10.043 2. Aasen, H., Honkavaara, E., Lucieer, A., & Zarco-Tejada, P. (2018). Quantitative remote sensing at ultra-high resolution with UAV spectroscopy: A review of sensor technology, measurement procedures, and data correction workflows. Remote Sensing, 10(7), 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071091 3. Abdelbaki, A., Schlerf, M., Retzlaff, R., Machwitz, M., Verrelst, J., & Udelhoven, T. (2021). Comparison of crop trait retrieval strategies using UAV-based VNIR hyperspectral imaging. Remote Sensing, 13, 1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091748 4. Adão, T., Hruška, J., Pádua, L., Bessa, J., Peres, E., Morais, R., Sousa, J. J. (2017). Hyperspectral imaging: A review on UAV-based sensors, data processing and applications for agriculture and forestry. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS9111110. 5. Allen, R. G., Tasumi, M., & Trezza, R. (2007). Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (metric)-model. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 133, 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:4(380)
|
|