Abstract
AbstractEnthusiasm regarding the “digital agriculture” revolution is widespread, yet objective research on how commercial farms actually use data and data services remains limited. The purpose of this research is to better understand the current positioning of U.S. commercial corn and soybean farms within the farm data lifecycle, including the collection, use, and impact of farm data. Using survey data from a sample of 800 commercial-scale U.S. corn and soybean farms, the factors associated with progression within the farm data lifecycle are examined. Results indicate that the majority of commercial U.S. corn and soybean farms collect data, indicate that the data they collect influences their decisions, and perceive positive yield benefits as a result of their data-informed decisions. However, farms vary in intensity of their data usage. Investments in data management and analysis resources are associated with progression within the farm data lifecycle. These investments comprise software products that manage and analyze data, including creating GPS maps, layering different data sources, and generating recommendations. Investments in human capital, either in on-farm employees with designated data responsibilities or in trusted off-farm service providers, are also associated with progression within the farm data lifecycle. Farms that have not yet invested in these types of data management and data analysis resources may be forfeiting the potential benefits associated with using their farm’s data to improve on-farm decision making.
Funder
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Center for Commercial Agricutlure
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference38 articles.
1. American Farm Bureau Federation. (2015). Privacy and Security Principals for Farm Data. Retrieved 26 March 2020, from https://list.etsi.org/scripts/wa.exe?A3=ind1603&L=AIOTIWG3&E=base64&P=46619071&B=--_004_7401EDE0FFA3AE4F9F3F3940166B1CB50149B193EMANMB10jdnetde_&T=application%2Fpdf;%20name=%22PrivacyAndSecurityPrinciplesForFarmData%20(2).pdf%22&N=PrivacyAndSecurityPrinciplesForFarmData%20(2).pdf&attachment=q&XSS=3
2. Coble, K. H., Mishra, A. K., Ferrell, S., & Griffin, T. (2018). Big data in agriculture: A challenge for the future. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40, 79–96.
3. Daberkow, S. G., & McBride, W. D. (2003). Farm and operator characteristics affecting the awareness and adoption of precision agriculture technologies in the US. Precision Agriculture, 4, 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024557205871
4. DeLay, N. D., Thompson, N. M., & Mintert, J. R. (2020). Precision Agriculture technology adoption and technical efficiency. Selected paper presented at the 2020 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Kansas City, MO. July 26–28.
5. Demestichas, K., & Daskalakis, E. (2020). Data lifecycle management in precision agriculture supported by information and communication technology. Agronomy, 10, 1648. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111648
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献