Abstract
AbstractPrecision agriculture, as part of modern agriculture, thrives on an enormously growing amount of information and data for processing and application. The spatial data used for yield forecasting or the delimitation of management zones are very diverse, often of different quality and in different units to each other. For various reasons, approaches to combining geodata are complex, but necessary if all relevant information is to be taken into account. Data fusion with belief structures offers the possibility to link geodata with expert knowledge, to include experiences and beliefs in the process and to maintain the comprehensibility of the framework in contrast to other “black box” models. This study shows the possibility of dividing agricultural land into management zones by combining soil information, relief structures and multi-temporal satellite data using the transferable belief model. It is able to bring in the knowledge and experience of farmers with their fields and can thus offer practical assistance in management measures without taking decisions out of hand. At the same time, the method provides a solution to combine all the valuable spatial data that correlate with crop vitality and yield. For the development of the method, eleven data sets in each possible combination and different model parameters were fused. The most relevant results for the practice and the comprehensibility of the model are presented in this study. The aim of the method is a zoned field map with three classes: “low yield”, “medium yield” and “high yield”. It is shown that not all data are equally relevant for the modelling of yield classes and that the phenology of the plant is of particular importance for the selection of satellite images. The results were validated with yield data and show promising potential for use in precision agriculture.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference57 articles.
1. Adamchuk, V. (2011). On-the-go soil sensors—are we there yet? In The second global workshop on proximal soil sensing. Montreal.
2. Al Momani, B., McClean, S., & Morrow, P. (2007). Using Dempster-Shafer to incorporate knowledge into satellite image classification. Artificial Intelligence Review,25(1–2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-007-9027-4.
3. Amt für Geoinformation Vermessungs- und Katasterwesen (Office for geoinformation, survey and land registry). (2011). DGM 5—Digitales Geländemodell Gitterweite 5 m (Digital elevation model, grid width 5 m). Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany. Retrieved from https://www.laiv-mv.de/Geoinformation/ Geobasisdaten/Gelaendemodelle/.
4. Arbeitsgruppe Boden (Soil working group). (2005). Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung (Soil scientific mapping manual) (5th ed.). Hannover: Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
5. Bartlett, M. S. (1935). The effect of non-normality on the t distribution. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,31(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100013311.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献