Spatiotemporally variable incident light, leaf photosynthesis, and yield across a greenhouse: fine-scale hemispherical photography and a photosynthesis model
-
Published:2022-07-09
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:114-138
-
ISSN:1385-2256
-
Container-title:Precision Agriculture
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Precision Agric
Author:
Kimura KensukeORCID, Yasutake Daisuke, Koikawa Kota, Kitano MasaharuORCID
Abstract
AbstractAlthough greenhouse agriculture can generate high crop yields, they vary due to spatiotemporal differences in incident light and photosynthesis. To elucidate these dynamics, multipoint analysis of hemispheric images and a photosynthesis model were used to visualize the spatiotemporal distribution of photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and leaf photosynthetic rate (A) and compared these with strawberry fruit yield in a greenhouse. This method enabled successful estimation of spatiotemporal variability in PPFD and A with relative root mean square errors of 4.4% and 11.0%, respectively. PPFD, captured at ca. 2 m resolution, varied diurnally and seasonally based on sun position and external light intensity. A showed less spatial variability, because it is reduced by physical and physiological mechanisms in the leaves at excessive leaf temperatures and becomes saturated at high PPFD. Yield spatial variability was better explained by A than by PPFD. The association between A and yield weakened over the cultivation period (R2 declined from 46% in winter to 12% in spring), thus suggesting that, over the cultivation period, factors such as photoassimilate availability replaced A as the primary limiting factor. The proposed method can be directly applied to other types of greenhouses, and the findings may facilitate spatiotemporal optimization in crop production, improving precision greenhouse agriculture.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference53 articles.
1. Berg, S., Kutra, D., Kroeger, T., Straehle, C. N., Kausler, B. X., Haubold, C., Schiegg, M., Ales, J., Beier, T., Rudy, M., Eren, K., Cervantes, J. I., Xu, B., Beuttenmueller, F., Wolny, A., Zhang, C., Koethe, U., Hamprecht, F. A., & Kreshuk, A. (2019). Ilastik: Interactive machine learning for (bio) image analysis. Nature Methods, 16, 1226–1232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0582-9 2. Bernacchi, C. J., Portis, A. R., Nakano, H., Von Caemmerer, S., & Long, S. P. (2002). Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of Rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo. Plant Physiology, 130, 1992–1998. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.008250 3. Boulard, T., Roy, J. C., Pouillard, J. B., Fatnassi, H., & Grisey, A. (2017). Modelling of micrometeorology, canopy transpiration and photosynthesis in a closed greenhouse using computational fluid dynamics. Biosystems Engineering, 158, 110–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.04.001 4. Buckley, T. N., & Diaz-Espejo, A. (2015). Reporting estimates of maximum potential electron transport rate. New Phytologist, 205, 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13018 5. Buckley, T. N., Martorell, S., Diaz-Espejo, A., Tomàs, M., & Medrano, H. (2014). Is stomatal conductance optimized over both time and space in plant crowns? A field test in grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Plant, Cell & Environment, 37, 2707–2721. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12343
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|