Author:
Hanisch E.,Weigel T. F.,Buia A.,Bruch H.-P.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. AOK-Bundesverband, FEISA, HELIOS Kliniken, WIDO: Qualitätssicherung der stationären Versorgung mit Routinedaten (QSR). Abschlussbericht. Bonn 2007 http://www.qualitaetssicherung-mit-routinedaten.de/imperia/md/qsr/publikationen/wido_kra_qsr-abschlussbericht_0407.pdf . Zugegriffen: 30. Nov. 2014
2. Arah OA, Klazinga NS (2004) How safe is the safety paradigm? Qual Saf Health Care 3:226–232
3. Aylin P, Bottle A, Majeed A (2007) Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.39168.496366.55
4. Berwick D (2015) Measuring surgical outcomes for improvement. Was Codman wrong?. JAMA 313:469–470
5. Best WR, Khuri SF, Phelan M, Hur K, Henderson WG, Demakis JG, Daley J (2002) Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 3:257–266
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献