1. Kachelrieß M, Krauss A. Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction (iMAR): Technical principles and clinical results in radiation therapy. Somat Sess – White Pap. 2015;1–16.
2. Ali AM. Evaluation of orthopedic metal artifact reduction application in three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of spinal instrumentation: a single saudi center experience. J Clinn Imaging Sci [Internet]. 2018;8:11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29619282.
3. Aissa J, Thomas C, Sawicki LM, Caspers J, Kröpil P, Antoch G, et al. Iterative metal artefact reduction in CT: can dedicated algorithms improve image quality after spinal instrumentation? Clin Radiol [Internet]. 2017 May 1;72(5):428.e7–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.12.006.
4. Hillengass J, Moulopoulos LA, Delorme S, Koutoulidis V, Mosebach J, Hielscher T, et al. Whole-body computed tomography versus conventional skeletal survey in patients with multiple myeloma: A study of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood Cancer J [Internet]. 2017;7(8). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2017.78.
5. Lambert, L., Ourednicek, P., Meckova, Z., Gavelli, G., Straub, J., & Spicka, I. (2017). Whole-body low-dose computed tomography in multiple myeloma staging: Superior diagnostic performance in the detection of bone lesions, vertebral compression fractures, rib fractures and extraskeletal findings compared to radiography with similar radiation. Oncol Lett., 13(4), 2490–4.