Cross-sectional analysis of maternal and neonatal factors influencing cord blood TSH and free T4 levels in congenital hypothyroidism screening

Author:

Sadeghi Nahideh,Mousavi SafaORCID,Mirmohammadkhani Majid,Rahmanian Mojgan

Abstract

Abstract Background Congenital hypothyroidism (CH) is the leading cause of cognitive impairment in children. Although screening programs have been successful in identifying cases of congenital hypothyroidism (CH), the high rates of recalling individuals for further testing and the occurrence of false positive results place a significant strain on healthcare systems globally. While cord blood thyroid-stimulating hormone (CBTSH) is commonly used as a screening test for congenital hypothyroidism (CH), there is less data available on its effectiveness in Iran. The objective of this study was to assess the levels of TSH and Free T4 in umbilical cord blood and examine their correlation with maternal and neonatal variables, as well as heel-stick TSH. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 120 mothers and their newborns were recruited from Semnan’s Amir-Al-Momenin Hospital in 2021. The maternal characteristics examined encompassed age, BMI, gravidity (number of pregnancies), history of abortions, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, gestational age, and delivery technique. The neonatal parameters encompassed in the study were sex, birth weight, number of gestation births, Apgar ratings, and arterial blood cord gases. The average values of Free T4 and CBTSH were measured and compared with these parameters. TSH levels were measured by a heel-stick procedure on days 2–3 following birth. The statistical analysis comprised of the Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Spearman correlation test. The diagnostic accuracy of CBTSH was evaluated using ROC curve analysis. Results The average concentration of CBTSH was substantially greater in preterm neonates and males compared to term newborns and females (P = 0.039 and P < 0.001, respectively). Newborns delivered by cesarean section exhibited significantly lower levels of CBTSH compared to those delivered vaginally (P = 0.040). A significant positive connection was seen between CBTSH and heel-stick TSH (P < 0.001). The average level of Free T4 in umbilical cord blood was substantially greater in neonates from women who had been pregnant multiple times compared to those who had been pregnant for the first time (P = 0.023). There was no statistically significant correlation observed between umbilical cord blood Free T4 and TSH levels and factors such as maternal age, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, twin or singleton delivery, Apgar scores, birthweight, and cord gases (P > 0.05). The most effective threshold value for CBTSH in detecting potentially abnormal cases of hypothyroidism was determined to be 14.75 mIU/L. Conclusions Delivery method, gestational age, and male gender were significant factors affecting umbilical cord TSH levels. These factors should be considered when interpreting CBTSH data. This study provides evidence for the inclusion of CBTSH as a predictive factor in CH screening programs.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference45 articles.

1. Lakshminarayana SG, Sadanandan NP, Mehaboob A, Gopaliah LR. Effect of maternal and neonatal factors on cord blood thyroid stimulating hormone. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;20(3):317–23.

2. Agrawal P, Philip R, Saran S, Gutch M, Razi MS, Agroiya P, et al. Congenital hypothyroidism. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19(2):221.

3. Fan P, Luo Z-C, Tang N, Wang W, Liu Z, Zhang J, et al. Advanced maternal age, mode of delivery, and thyroid hormone levels in Chinese newborns. Front Endocrinol. 2020;10:913.

4. Raj S, Baburaj S, George J, Abraham B, Singh S. Cord blood TSH level variations in newborn–experience from a rural centre in Southern India. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2014;8(7):PC18.

5. Nanayakkaral D, Wijekoon A, Jiffry N, Mudiyanse R, Nilam J, Perera K. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism in government hospitals in Sri Lanka. Proceedings of the Peradeniya University Research Sessions, Sri Lanka. 2007; 12: 133-34.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3