A Systems Thinking Approach for Community Health and Wellbeing

Author:

Morgan Michelle J.ORCID,Stratford ElaineORCID,Harpur SiobhanORCID,Rowbotham SamanthaORCID

Abstract

AbstractUnder national or state-based legislation, local governments are commonly required to prepare municipal health and wellbeing plans. Yet, the issues these plans aim to address are often complex, and programmatic planning approaches traditionally used by practitioners struggle to engage with such complexity as they assume these issues can be ‘solved’ in isolation. Systems thinking is increasingly being used as an approach to deal with those struggles more effectively, yet little is known about whether local governments and other stakeholders think systems approaches are feasible and acceptable in practice. This study tested a systems thinking approach to gauge if it could better address complex place-based health and wellbeing issues, such as to reduce noncommunicable diseases. Guided by a systems change framework, the approach comprised a facilitated systemic inquiry and rich picture process involving diverse stakeholders in a remote municipality in the Australian state of Tasmania. Among the participants there was broad support for the systems approach tested and they thought it was effective for increasing systems thinking capacity, collaboratively revealing systemic issues, and identifying opportunities to address those issues. They valued the rich picture because it created shared understandings of local issues. The findings suggest more is needed from macro-level policy to support place-based stakeholders to undertake systems approaches in practice, which could result in more sustainable and effective systems change required to improve health and wellbeing outcomes. The findings have implications for theory, research, and practice across interdisciplinary fields concerned with placed-based systems change, especially in rural and remote municipalities.

Funder

University of Tasmania

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management

Reference77 articles.

1. Abson DJ, Fischer J, Leventon J, Newig J, Schomerus T, Vilsmaier U, Von Wehrden H, Abernethy P, Ives CD, Jager NW, Lang DJ (2017) Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 46(1):30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS] (2018) Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2016. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved June 25, 2020 from https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/2033.0.55.001~2016~Main%20Features~IRSD~19#:~:text=The%20Index%20of%20Relative%20Socio,only%20measures%20of%20relative%20disadvantage

3. Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS] (2020) National Health Survey: small area estimates, 2017–18, Australia. In (April 17, 2020 ed.): Commonwealth of Australia

4. Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS] (2021) Regional population, 2019–20. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved November 15, 2021 from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/regional-population/2019-20

5. Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS] (2022) Snapshot of Tasmania: High level summary data for Tasmania 2021. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved August 9, 2022 from https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/snapshot-tas-2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3