Abstract
AbstractThis article revisits Morten Levin’s article, “Academic integrity in action research” published in the journal, Action Research (Levin 2012). It develops the main theme of rigour and relevance from the perspective of interiority. Interiority is a philosophical theory and method that enables action researchers attend to the data of their consciousness, that is how they experience, question, understand, test their understanding, make judgments, make decisions and act, which Levin understands as bildung. I offer interiority as the perspective on how rigour and relevance may be understood and integrated in a reframing of the bildung of action researchers as Morten discussed it in 2012.
Funder
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Bartunek JM, Rynes SL (2014) Academics and practitioners are alike and unalike. The paradoxes od academic-practitioners relationships. J Manag 40(5):11981–11201
2. Coghlan D (2010) Interiority as the cutting edge between theory and practice: a first person perspective. Int J Action Res 6(2–3):288–307
3. Coghlan D (2017) How might we learn about the philosophy of ODC research from 24 volumes of ROCD? An invitation to interiority. In A.B. (Rami) Shani & D.A. Noumair (eds.) Research in organizational change and development, (Vol 25. pp. 335–361). Bingley: Emerald
4. Coghlan D (2024) Edgar H. Schein: the artistry of a reflexive organizational scholar practitioner. Routledge, Abingdon
5. Coghlan D, Shani AB (Rami) (eds) (2016) Action research in business and management. 4 volumes. Sage, London
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献