The Macroeconomic Controversy Over Price Rigidity — How to Resolve it and How Bayesian Estimation has Led us Astray

Author:

Meenagh DavidORCID,Minford Patrick,Wickens Michael R.

Abstract

AbstractPrice rigidity plays a central role in macroeconomic models but remains controversial. Those espousing it look to Bayesian estimated models in support, while those assuming price flexibility largely impose it on their models. So controversy continues unresolved by testing on the data. In a Monte Carlo experiment we ask how different estimation methods could help to resolve this controversy. We find Bayesian estimation creates a large potential estimation bias compared with standard estimation techniques. Indirect estimation where the bias is found to be low appears to do best, and offers the best way forward for settling the price rigidity controversy.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference17 articles.

1. Adjemian S, Bastani H, Juillard M, Karamé F, Maih J, Mihoubi F, Mutschler W, Perendia G, Pfeifer J, Ratto M, Villemot S (2011) Dynare: Reference Manual, Version 4. Dynare Working Papers, 1, CEPREMAP

2. Chari VV, Kehoe PJ, McGrattan ER (2009) New keynesian models: not yet useful for policy analysis. Am Econ J Macroecon 1(1):242–66

3. Christiano LJ, Eichenbaum M, Evans CL (2005) Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. J Polit Econ 113:1–45

4. Evans GW, Honkapohja S (2005) Interview with Thomas. J Sargent Macroecon Dyn 9(4):561–583

5. Friedman M (1953) ’The methodology of positive economics’, in Essays in positive Economics, University of Chicago Press

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Drivers of Large Recessions and Monetary Policy Responses;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024

2. Drivers of large recessions and monetary policy responses;Journal of International Money and Finance;2023-10

3. The Calvo parameter revisited: an unbiased insight;Applied Economics Letters;2023-09-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3