Polarized Classification Tree Models: Theory and Computational Aspects

Author:

Ballante Elena,Galvani Marta,Uberti Pierpaolo,Figini SilviaORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, a new approach in classification models, called Polarized Classification Tree model, is introduced. From a methodological perspective, a new index of polarization to measure the goodness of splits in the growth of a classification tree is proposed. The new introduced measure tackles weaknesses of the classical ones used in classification trees (Gini and Information Gain), because it does not only measure the impurity but it also reflects the distribution of each covariate in the node, i.e., employing more discriminating covariates to split the data at each node. From a computational prospective, a new algorithm is proposed and implemented employing the new proposed measure in the growth of a tree. In order to show how our proposal works, a simulation exercise has been carried out. The results obtained in the simulation framework suggest that our proposal significantly outperforms impurity measures commonly adopted in classification tree modeling. Moreover, the empirical evidence on real data shows that Polarized Classification Tree models are competitive and sometimes better with respect to classical classification tree models.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Psychology (miscellaneous),Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Reference38 articles.

1. Aluja-Banet, T.N.E. (2003). Stability and scalability in decision trees. Computational Statistics, 18(3), 505–520.

2. Aria, M., D’Ambrosio, A., Iorio, C., Siciliano, R., & Cozza, V. (2018). Dynamic recursive tree-based partitioning for malignant melanoma identification in skin lesion dermoscopic images. Statistical papers, pp. 1–17.

3. Bohanec, M., & Rajkovic, V. (1990). DEX: an expert system shell for decision support. Sistemica, 1, 145–157.

4. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., & Olsen, R. (1984). Classification and regression trees.

5. Buntine, W., & Niblett, T. (1992). A further comparison of splitting rules for decision-tree induction. Machine Learning, 8, 75–85.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3