Author:
Amin Md Nurul,Lobry de Bruyn Lisa,Hossain Md Sarwar,Lawson Andrew,Wilson Brian
Abstract
AbstractSoil carbon sequestration programmes are a way of offsetting GHG emissions, however, it requires agricultural landholders to be engaged in such initiatives for carbon offsets to occur. Farmer engagement is low in market-based programmes for soil carbon credits in Australia. We interviewed long-term practitioners (n = 25) of rotational grazing in high-rainfall lands of New South Wales, Australia to understand their current social-ecological system (SES) of soil carbon management (SCM). The aim was to identify those components of the SES that motivate them to manage soil carbon and also influence their potential engagement in soil carbon sequestration programmes. Utilising first-tier and second-tier concepts from Ostrom’s SES framework, the interview data were coded and identified a total of 51 features that characterised the farmers’ SES of SCM. Network analysis of farmer interview data revealed that the current SES of SCM has low connectivity among the SES features (30%). In four workshops with interviewed farmers (n = 2) and invited service providers (n = 2) the 51 features were reviewed and participants decided on the positioning and the interactions between features that were considered to influence SCM into a causal loop diagram. Post-workshop, 10 feedback loops were identified that revealed the different and common perspectives of farmers and service providers on SCM in a consolidated causal loop diagram. Defining the SES relationships for SCM can identify the challenges and needs of stakeholders, particularly farmers, which can then be addressed to achieve local, national and international objectives, such as SCM co-benefits, GHG reduction, carbon sequestration targets and SDGs.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pollution,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference58 articles.
1. Alford AR, Griffith GR, Davies L (2003) Livestock Farming Systems in the Northern Tablelands of NSW: An Economic Analysis. In: AgEcon Search. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/28005/
2. Amin M, Shil S, Ghosh R, Shamsuzzoha M (2016) Influence of conservation tillage on carbon sequestration mechanism related to aggregation J Environ Sci Nat Resour 9:23–27. https://doi.org/10.3329/jesnr.v9i1.30286
3. Amin MN, Hossain MS, Lobry de Bruyn L, Wilson B (2020) A systematic review of soil carbon management in Australia and the need for a social-ecological systems framework. Sci Total Environ 719:135182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135182
4. Amin MN, Lobry de Bruyn L, Lawson A, Wilson B, Hossain MS (2023) Lessons learned from farmers’ experience of soil carbon management practices in grazing regimes of Australia. Agron Sustain Dev 43(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00863-8
5. Australian Government (2020) Purchasing carbon credits with co-benefits. In: www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au. http://www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/csf/how-you-can-benefit/Pages/purchasing-carbon-credits-with-co-benefits.aspx
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献