Abstract
AbstractDespite the rapid and accelerating rate of global environmental changes, too often research that has the potential to inform more sustainable futures remains disconnected from the context in which it could be used. Though transdisciplinary approaches (TDA) are known to overcome this disconnect, institutional barriers frequently prevent their deployment. Here we use insights from a qualitative comparative analysis of five case studies to develop a process for helping researchers and funders conceptualize and implement socially engaged research within existing institutional structures. The process we propose is meant to help researchers achieve societal as well as scientific outcomes relatively early in a project, as an end in itself or en route to greater engagement later. If projects that have a strong foundation of dialog and shared power wish to use TDA within current institutional and academic structures, we suggest that they focus on three process-based factors to increase their chances for success: (1) the maturity of relationships within a collaboration, (2) the level of context knowledge present within the collaborative team, and (3) the intensity of the engagement efforts within the project.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pollution,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference104 articles.
1. Agar M (2013) The lively science: remodeling human social research. Mill City Press, Minneapolis
2. Alvesson M, Gabriel Y, Paulsen R (2017) Return to meaning: a social science with something to say. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
3. Amara N, Ouimet M, Landry R (2004) New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies. Sci Commun 26:75–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547004267491
4. Association of Public Land-Grant Universities (2019) Public impact research: engaged universities making the difference. Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities, Washington, DC
5. American Evaluation Association (2018). https://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=51. Accessed 5/21/19
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献