Abstract
AbstractScholars and practitioners have been striving to develop straightforward and effective tools to measure protected area management effectiveness (PAME). UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (BR), with their unique functional and zonation schemes are monitored according to their compulsory 10-year Periodic Review (PR), which is useful for UNESCO’s evaluation purposes but lacks comprehensiveness and utility for adaptive management. Based on existing PAME methodologies, we develop and propose the first quantitative tool for the evaluation of BR management effectiveness, that would enhance and complement the currently used qualitative PR report, and serve the rapid evaluation needed for BR managers to monitor, evaluate, and adapt their management approach to achieve the three functions of BRs. The tool consists of 65 indicators, embodied within the 6 elements of the World Commission on Protected Areas Framework. We then tested this tool, named Biosphere Reserve Effectiveness of Management index (BREMi) to evaluate management effectiveness across the Arab Man and the Biosphere Reserve network involving 17 BRs spanning 8 countries of the Middle East and North Africa. BREMi scores ranged from 4.43 to 8.65 (on a scale between 0 and 10), with a mean of 6.31 ± 1.040. All indicators were considered valuable measures of progress by our respondents, as well as by independent experts. We discuss our findings in light of available literature concerning the Arab region and through the conceptual frames of adaptive management and resilience. Finally, we discuss where the BREMi tool would be most useful for BR management authorities in the iterative process of evaluation and adaptive management.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pollution,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference68 articles.
1. Adams VM, Iacona GD, Possingham HP (2019) Weighing the benefits of expanding protected areas versus managing existing ones. Nat Sustain 2:404–411. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0275-5
2. Anthony B, Shestackova E (2015) Do global indicators of protected area management effectiveness make sense? A case study from Siberia. Environ Manag 56:176–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0495-z
3. Anthony BP (2008) Use of modified threat reduction assessments to estimate success of conservation measures within and adjacent to Kruger National Park, South Africa. Conserv Biol 22(6):1497–1505
4. Anthony BP, Swemmer L (2015) Co-defining program success: Identifying objectives and indicators towards adaptively managing a livestock damage compensation scheme at Kruger National Park, South Africa. J Nat Conserv 26:65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2015.05.004
5. Anthony BP, Matar DA (2012) Protected areas in selected Arab countries of the Levant region (Syria, Lebanon & Jordan): an evaluation of management and recommendations for improvement. In: Povilitis T (ed) Topics in Conservation Biology. InTech Publishers, Rijeka, Croatia, p 1–26
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献