Abstract
AbstractMany academic teachers present data as static graphics in their lectures and courses. However, data structures have become more complex in the last decades, especially in the biomedical disciplines, and interactive graphics can provide a better means to communicate the scientific contents to students. Besides, the technological qualifications of academic staff are diverse, and it has been little studied how these teachers can be trained to program and implement interactive graphics for their courses. It is also little known whether interactive graphics will be helpful for teaching and learning. We conducted a pilot online workshop to identify aspects that need to be addressed when teaching academic staff to program interactive graphics in form of Shiny-apps based on the programing language R. The n = 25 participants were academic staff from the fields of medicine or natural sciences. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires were used to identify which aspects should be considered in future workshops, to query the usefulness of interactive graphics for teachers and students, and to identify the impact of the workshop on the teacher’s opinion towards digital teaching devices and their preparedness to program own interactive graphics. Most participants showed strong interest to use interactive graphics in their courses after the workshop, and interactive graphics were overall rated as very helpful for teachers and students. However, only those with prior programming knowledge intended to implement own graphics. We conclude that an extension of the workshop will be necessary to provide additional training for participants with no background in R programming.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Culture of the State Lower Saxony
Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover (TIHO)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Human-Computer Interaction,Education,Mathematics (miscellaneous)
Reference71 articles.
1. Abdal-Haqq, I. (1995). Infusing technology into preservice teacher education. ERIC Digest. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED389699
2. Ali, S. M., Gupta, N., Nayak, G. K., & Lenka, R. K. (2016). Big data visualization: Tools and challenges. In 2016 2nd international conference on contemporary computing and informatics (IC3I) (pp. 656–660). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3I.2016.7918044
3. Anderson, J. Q., Boyles, J. L., & Rainie, L. (2012). The future impact of the internet on higher education: experts expect more efficient collaborative environments and new grading schemes; They worry about massive online courses, the shift away from on-campus life. Pew Internet & American Life Project. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED534048
4. Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
5. Augustiniene, A., & Ciuciulkiene, N. (2013). Reverse mentoring as facilitating factor for the development of a beginning teacher’s self-authorship process. Social Sciences, 81(3), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ss.81.3.5791