Short, Long, and Segmented Learning Videos: From YouTube Practice to Enhanced Video Players

Author:

Seidel NielsORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn the literature, one can find many claims about how long a learning video should be, but only a few valid reasons and even less empirical evidence. It is argued that a video should be as short as possible according to the learners’ attention span. Short videos shall prevent the learner from becoming too passive. The Segmenting Principle postulates the division of longer passages into smaller, separate sections as an alternative to shortening. In this article, we present two studies. In the first study, we examined the video length and segmentations of the entire 895 German and a sample of 524 English channels from YouTube Education (83,558/154,370 videos). We clustered the videos by length into three groups and identified a series of videos by their titles. Short Videos with up to 14 or 22 min of playing time can be considered common practice. About 8 % of the videos with short lengths were part of a series of segmented videos. Videos of medium length were part of a series in 21 % and 14 % of the cases. We conclude that dividing comprehensive video-based learning resources into multiple segments is a common practice. In the second study, we investigate two design variants for structuring longer videos into segments: (i) video with an additional chapter overview, visible chapter boundaries, and navigation options for the segments, and (ii) sequence of segmented videos of suitable length. An online user study compared these two variants with non-segmented video players (N=22). Segmented videos resulted in higher learning gains than the non-segmented version of the same video. The participants perceived the segmented videos in conditions (i) and (ii) better structured. The question of video length is not crucial for learning outcomes as long as the video can be provided in meaningful segments within the video player.

Funder

CATALPA

FernUniversität in Hagen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3