Abstract
AbstractThis article outlines relevant economic patterns in a world with artificial intelligence (AI). Five specific economic patterns influenced by AI are discussed: (1) following in the footsteps of ‘homo economicus’ a new type of agent, ‘machina economica’, enters the stage of the global economy. (2) The pattern of division of labor and specialization is further accelerated by AI-induced micro-division of labor. (3) The introduction of AI leads to triangular agency relationships and next level information asymmetries. (4) Data and AI-based machine labor have to be understood as new factors of production. (5) The economics of AI networks can lead to market dominance and unwanted external effects. The analytical perspective is rooted in institutional economics and serves to integrate findings from relevant disciplines in economics and computer science. It is based on the research proposition that ‘institutional matters’ are of high relevance also in a world with AI but that AI gives a new meaning to these matters. The discussion unveils a reinforcing interdependence of the patterns portrayed and points to required research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference120 articles.
1. Agrawal A (2018) The economics of artificial intelligence. In: McKinsey Quarterly. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-analytics/our-insights/the-economics-of-artificial-intelligence
2. Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2018) Prediction machines. The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston
3. Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (eds) (2019) The economics of artificial intelligence. An agenda. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.001.0001 (National Bureau of Economic Research conference report)
4. Agrawal A, McHale J, Oettl A (2019) Finding needles in haystacks: artificial intelligence and recombinant growth. In: Agrawal A, Gans H, Goldfarb A (eds) The economics of artificial intelligence. An agenda. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.001.0001 (National Bureau of Economic Research conference report)
5. Akerlof G (1970) The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart J Econ 84:488–500
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献