Abstract
AbstractThe fact that Veblen was a keen critic of the neo-classical concept of “economic man” is well known. However, the following issues have not been discussed in enough depth: how he rebuilt the traditional theory of human nature through his new methodology of economics, how much his methodological revision broadened the scope of economics, and what kind of phenomena Veblen’s economic theory elucidates. This article examines these issues and aims to show the logical connection between Veblen’s controversial proposal on the methodology of economics and his analysis of economic phenomena. Specifically, it reconsiders Veblen’s analysis of economic action using a unique concept of instincts, his logic of explaining the relation between society and human nature, his way of drawing history from the relativistic worldview, and his characteristic method of grasping the cause and effect of economic phenomena. Finally, it highlights the importance of modifying the concept of “economic man” by focusing on the qualitative aspect. Particular reference is made to the economic concepts of utility, efficiency, and intangibility.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Almeida F (2015) The psychology of early institutional economics: the instinctive approach of Thorstein Veblen’s conspicuous consumer theory. EconomiA 16:226–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2015.05.002
2. Bloch M (1983) Marxism and anthropology: the history of a relationship. Clarendon Press, Oxford
3. Carleton College (1880) Annual catalogue of the officers and students of Carleton College, Northfield Minn., For the Academic Year, 1879–80. Pioneer Press Print, Saint Paul
4. Commons JR (1934) Institutional economics: Its place in political economy. Macmillan, New York
5. Dorfman J (1934) (1972) Thorstein Veblen and his America with new appendices. Augustus M, Kelley, New York
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献