Author:
Salado-Cid Rubén,Vallecillo Antonio,Munir Kamram,Romero José Raúl
Abstract
AbstractData-intensive applications aim at discovering valuable knowledge from large amounts of data coming from real-world sources. Typically, workflow languages are used to specify these applications, and their associated engines enable the execution of the specifications. However, as these applications become commonplace, new challenges arise. Existing workflow languages are normally platform-specific, which severely hinders their interoperability with other languages and execution engines. This also limits their reusability outside the platforms for which they were originally defined. Following the Design Science Research methodology, the paper presents SWEL (Scientific Workflow Execution Language). SWEL is a domain-specific modeling language for the specification of data-intensive workflows that follow the model-driven engineering principles, covering the high-level definition of tasks, information sources, platform requirements, and mappings to the target technologies. SWEL is platform-independent, enables collaboration among data scientists across multiple domains and facilitates interoperability. The evaluation results show that SWEL is suitable enough to represent the concepts and mechanisms of commonly used data-intensive workflows. Moreover, SWEL facilitates the development of related technologies such as editors, tools for exchanging knowledge assets between workflow management systems, and tools for collaborative workflow development.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Alaasam ABA, Radchenko GI, Tchernykh AN (2021) Micro-workflows data stream processing model for industrial internet of things. Supercomput Front Inn 8(1):82–98
2. Altintas I, Berkley C, Jaeger E, Jones M, Ludäscher B, Mock S (2004) Kepler: an extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows. In: Proceedings of the international conference on scientific and statistical database management (SSDBM), vol 16, pp 423–424
3. Amin K, von Laszewski G, Hategan M, Zaluzec N, Hampton S, Rossi A (2004) GridAnt: a client-controllable grid workflow system. In: Proceedings of HICSS’04
4. Amstutz P, Crusoe MR, Tijanić N, Chapman B, Chilton J, Heuer M, Kartashov A, Leehr D, Ménager H, Nedeljkovich M, Scales M, Soiland-Reyes S, Stojanovic L (2020) Common workflow language description, v1.2. https://w3id.org/cwl/v1.2/
5. Anjorin A, Buchmann T, Westfechtel B, Diskin Z, Ko HS, Eramo R, Hinkel G, Samimi-Dehkordi L, Zündorf A (2020) Benchmarking bidirectional transformations: theory, implementation, application, and assessment. Softw Syst Model 19(3):647–691