Author:
Weeger Andy,Wagner Heinz-Theo,Gewald Heiko,Weitzel Tim
Abstract
AbstractThe study analyzes data collected in two case studies in the healthcare industry, which is characterized by a variety of social and technical elements forming an activity system where all elements interact with each other. The findings indicate that many problems emerging during the implementation of a health information system can be traced back to contradictions between elements of the activity systems that are created or amplified by the new IS. The authors find that some contradictions are latent and become salient when introducing a new IS, while other contradictions are (unintentionally) newly created. Also, the study shows that contradictions are more complex than hitherto assumed and often concern more than two elements of a healthcare activity system. In a similar vein, effective interventions geared toward countering these contradictions are found to account for additional complexity while not always achieving their goal. Drawing on activity theory, the authors develop a framework to coherently synthesize the findings. The study can help increase the understanding of the IS’s role within an activity system and help guide IS implementation projects aimed at avoiding unintended consequences.
Funder
Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Neu-Ulm
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Abouzahra M, Guenter D, Tan J (2015) Integrating information systems and healthcare research to understand physicians’ use of health information systems: a literature review. In: Paper presented at the international conference on information systems, Fort Worth
2. Agarwal R, Gao G, DesRoches C, Jha AK (2010) Research commentary: the digital transformation of healthcare: current status and the road ahead. Inform Sys Res 21(4):796–809
3. Albert D, Kreutzer M, Lechner C (2015) Resolving the paradox of interdependency and strategic renewal in activity systems. Acad Manag Rev 40(2):210–234
4. Allen DK, Brown A, Karanasios S, Norman A (2013a) How should technology-mediated organizational change be explained? A comparison of the contributions of critical realism and activity theory. MIS Q 37(3):835–854
5. Allen DK, Karanasios S, Norman A (2013b) Information sharing and interoperability: the case of major incident management. Europ J Inf Syst 23(4):418–432
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The power of critique;Against Critical Thinking in Health, Social Care and Social Work;2023-07-10