Quantifying uncertainties related to observational datasets used as reference for regional climate model evaluation over complex topography — a case study for the wettest year 2010 in the Carpathian region

Abstract

AbstractGridded observational datasets are often used for the evaluation of regional climate model (RCM) simulations. However, the uncertainty of observations affects the evaluation. This work introduces a novel method to quantify the uncertainties in the observational datasets and how these uncertainties affect the evaluation of RCM simulations. Besides precipitation and temperature, our method uses geographic variables (e.g. elevation, variability of elevation, effect of station), which are considered as uncertainty sources. To assess these uncertainties, a complex analysis based on various statistical tools, e.g. correlation analysis and permutation test, was carried out. Furthermore, we used a special metric, the reduction of error (RE) to identify where the RCM shows improvement compared to the lateral boundary conditions (LBCs). We focused on the Carpathian region, because of its unique orographic and climatic conditions. The method is applied to two observational datasets (CarpatClim and E-OBS) and to RegCM simulations for 2010, the wettest year in this region since 1901.The results show that CarpatClim is wetter than E-OBS, while temperature is similar over the lowland; however, E-OBS is significantly warmer than CarpatClim over the mountains. By the RE metric, RegCM has improvement against the LBCs over mountains for temperature and areas with dense station network for precipitation. Nevertheless, there are significant differences in the results depending on which observational dataset was used concerning precipitation. The evaluation method can be applied to other datasets, different time periods and areas. It is also suitable to find dataset errors, which is also exemplified in this paper.