Abstract
AbstractDifferentiated service delivery and new products, such as long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) and the dapivirine vaginal ring (DVR), could increase uptake and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. We explored PrEP provider perspectives on differentiated PrEP service delivery and new PrEP products to inform World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and programme implementation. 150 PrEP providers who participated in a WHO survey were randomly selected and 67 were invited for interviews based on geographic representation, provider cadre, gender, experience with community-based PrEP service delivery, and familiarity with new PrEP products. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually. Key themes were inductively extracted relating to differentiated service delivery and benefits and concerns regarding new PrEP products. 30 PrEP providers from 24 countries were interviewed. Across regions, providers were supportive of differentiated service delivery to respond to clients’ needs and preferences, maintain services during COVID-19, and ensure access for priority populations that may face access challenges. Providers welcomed prospects of offering CAB-LA to their clients but had concerns about HIV testing, costs, and the need for clinic-based services, including staff who can administer injections. Providers felt the DVR was potentially important for some cisgender women, especially young clients and female sex workers, and raised fewer concerns compared to injectable PrEP. Providers’ views are critical for the development of guidelines and implementing programmes that will best serve PrEP users. Understanding areas where provider capacities and biases may create barriers can define opportunities for training and support to ensure that providers can deliver effective programmes.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Unitaid
World Health Organization
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Social Psychology
Reference35 articles.
1. Schaefer R, Schmidt H-MA, Ravasi G, Mozalevskis A, Rewari BB, Lule F, et al. Adoption of guidelines on and use of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis: a global summary and forecasting study. Lancet HIV. 2021;8:e502–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00127-2
2. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). IN DANGER: UNAIDS Global AIDS Update 2022. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2022. https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2022-global-aids-update_en.pdf
3. Kerzner M, De AK, Yee R, Keating R, Djomand G, Stash S, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake and service delivery adaptations during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 21 PEPFAR-funded countries. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0266280. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266280
4. Murphy E, Doherty M, El Sadr W, Zaidi I, Kamarazulman A, Crowley S, et al. Innovations, adaptations, and accelerations in the delivery of HIV services during COVID-19. Lancet HIV. 2022;9:e884–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00268-5
5. World Health Organization (WHO). Differentiated and simplified pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: update to WHO implementation guidance. Technical brief. Geneva: WHO; 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053694
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献