How is Clinical Trial Reimbursement Money Spent? South African Trial Participants’ Reported Reimbursement Spending Patterns and Perceptions of Appropriate Reimbursement Amounts
-
Published:2021-08-11
Issue:2
Volume:26
Page:604-612
-
ISSN:1090-7165
-
Container-title:AIDS and Behavior
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:AIDS Behav
Author:
Milford CeciliaORCID,
Cavanagh Tammany,
Ralfe Yolandie,
Maphumulo Virginia,
Beksinska Mags,
Smit Jennifer
Abstract
AbstractReimbursement of participants in clinical trials is extensively debated. Guidance recommends that compensation should reflect time, inconvenience and reimbursement of expenses. This study describes how participants spend their reimbursement and perceptions of appropriate reimbursement amounts. This was a sub-study of the evidence for contraceptive options and HIV outcomes (ECHO) trial. Participants were from two sites in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. A mixed methods approach was used. 500 participants completed a questionnaire, and 32 participated in one of four focus group discussions (FGD). The majority (81%) used reimbursement for transport to the research site, followed by toiletry purchases (64%). Many described how reimbursement supplemented income, used to cover basic living costs. Some used money to buy luxury items and takeaway foods. The ideal reimbursement amount per visit ranged: ZAR150-ZAR340 (US$10–24). Reimbursement spending and perceptions are in line with local guidance. Reimbursement should consider risk minimization together with ensuring informed, voluntary decision making.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
United States Agency for International Development
the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Social Psychology
Reference31 articles.
1. Burgess L, Sulzre N, Emanuel S. Clinical trial remuneration: the patients perspective. S Afr Med J. 2008;98(2):95–8.
2. Largent EA, Grady C, Miller FG, Wertheimer A. Money, coercion and undue inducement: a survey of attitudes about payments to research participants. IRB Ethics Human Res. 2012;34(1):1–8.
3. Gelinas L, White SA, Bierer BE. Economic vulnerability and payment for research participation. Clin Trials. 2020;17(3):264–72.
4. Breitkopf CR, Loza M, Vincent K, Moench T, Stanberry LR, Rosenthal SL. Perceptions of reimbursement for clinical trial participation. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011;6(3):31–8.
5. Department of Health. South African good clinical practice: clinical trial guidelines. 3rd ed. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Health; 2019.