Abstract
AbstractThe extent to which receptive anal intercourse (RAI) increases the HIV acquisition risk of women compared to receptive vaginal intercourse (RVI) is poorly understood. We evaluated RAI practice over time and its association with HIV incidence during three prospective HIV cohorts of women: RV217, MTN-003 (VOICE), and HVTN 907. At baseline, 16% (RV 217), 18% (VOICE) of women reported RAI in the past 3 months and 27% (HVTN 907) in the past 6 months, with RAI declining during follow-up by around 3-fold. HIV incidence in the three cohorts was positively associated with reporting RAI at baseline, albeit not always significantly. The adjusted hazard rate ratios for potential confounders (aHR) were 1.1 (95% Confidence interval: 0.8–1.5) for VOICE and 3.3 (1.6–6.8) for RV 217, whereas the ratio of cumulative HIV incidence by RAI practice was 1.9 (0.6-6.0) for HVTN 907. For VOICE, the estimated magnitude of association increased slightly when using a time-varying RAI exposure definition (aHR = 1.2; 0.9–1.6), and for women reporting RAI at every follow-up survey (aHR = 2.0 (1.3–3.1)), though not for women reporting higher RAI frequency (> 30% acts being RAI vs. no RAI in the past 3 months; aHR = 0.7 (0.4–1.1)). Findings indicated precise estimation of the RAI/HIV association, following multiple RVI/RAI exposures, is sensitive to RAI exposure definition, which remain imperfectly measured. Information on RAI practices, RAI/RVI frequency, and condom use should be more systematically and precisely recorded and reported in studies looking at sexual behaviors and HIV seroconversions; standardized measures would aid comparability across geographies and over time.
Funder
National Institute of Health
Medical Research Council
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Henry M. Jackson Foundation
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Social Psychology
Reference35 articles.
1. McBride KR, Fortenberry JD. Heterosexual anal sexuality and anal sex behaviors: a review. J Sex Res Mar. 2010;47(2):123–36.
2. Voeller B. AIDS and heterosexual anal intercourse. Arch Sex Behav Jun. 1991;20(3):233–76.
3. Owen BN, Elmes J, Silhol R, et al. How common and frequent is heterosexual anal intercourse among South Africans? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Aids Soc Jan. 2017;11(1):1–14.
4. Baggaley RF, White RG, Boily MC. HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention. Int J Epidemiol Aug. 2010;39(4):1048–63.
5. Halperin DT. Heterosexual anal intercourse: prevalence, cultural factors, and HIV infection and other health risks, part I. AIDS patient care and STDs Dec. 1999;13(12):717–30.