Abstract
AbstractThe development of digital technologies has led to the emergence of new business models benefiting consumers in their searching, shopping and communicating activities. However, it also challenges the applicable competition law framework and enforcement. Although there seems to be a global consensus on the need to update competition law, the EU and China have chosen different regulatory tools—hard law and soft law, respectively—to address the new and complex challenges facing the competition governance of digital markets. This paper aims to explore why the EU opted for hard law while China opted for soft law, and to further examine whether the selected regulatory tool is the most appropriate in the specific context. By analyzing and comparing characteristics of the digital market and competition institutions’ powers in the EU and China, the paper concludes firstly, that, through the use of hard law, the EU is able protect the Internal Market and at the same time overcome the inflexibility of hard law by adding review articles. Secondly, the paper concludes that, through the use of soft law, China is able to take advantage of soft law to rapidly respond to public attention in the digital market and, at the same time, overcome the non-legally binding force of soft law by strengthening the power of its competition authority.
Funder
China Scholarship Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference82 articles.
1. Abbott K, Snidal D (2000) Hard and soft law in international governance. Int Organ 54(3):421–456
2. Alberti J, Eliantonio M (2021) Judges, public authorities and EU soft law in Italy: how you cannot tell a book by its cover. In: Eliantonio M, Korkea-aho E, Stefan O (eds) EU soft law in the member states: theoretical findings and empirical evidence. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 185–200
3. Anti-Monopoly Commission of the State Council (2021) 国务院反垄断委员会关于平台经济领域的反垄断指南解读 (Explanation of the Anti-Monopoly Guidelines of the Anti-Monopoly Committee of the State Council on Platform Economy) (in Chinese). [Viewed 5 March 2022]. Available from: https://gkml.samr.gov.cn/nsjg/xwxcs/202102/t20210207_325970.html
4. Baxter R (1980) international law in her infinite variety. Int Compar Law Q 29:549–566
5. Beijing Administration for Market Regulation (2021) 北京市平台经济领域反垄断合规指引 (Anti-monopoly compliance guidelines in the field of platform economy in Beijing). [Viewed 5 March 2022]. Available from: http://scjgj.beijing.gov.cn/zwxx/scjgdt/202112/t20211209_2557026.html
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献