Abstract
Abstract
Background
Multidisciplinary care for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) has been reported to be effective in preventing deterioration of renal function and avoiding hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter.
Methods
We included 171 patients who received dialysis at our department between October 2014 and June 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: an inpatient group who received inpatient multidisciplinary care for CKD (educational hospitalization) prior to outpatient collaborative care from their family physician and nephrologist, and a non-inpatient group who did not receive such care. We compared factors related to dialysis induction.
Results
There was no significant difference in eGFR between the groups at the start of observation. The mean time from the start of observation to dialysis induction (inpatient group vs. non-inpatient group; 40.8 ± 2.8 vs. 23.9 ± 3.0 months, respectively; P < 0.001) and the rate of hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter (22.5 vs. 47.1%, respectively; P = 0.002) were significantly different between the groups. Survival analysis showed that the time to dialysis induction was significantly longer in the inpatient group (P = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that educational hospitalization (odds ratio = 0.30 [95% CI 0.13, 0.67]) was significantly associated with hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter.
Conclusion
Educational hospitalization prior to outpatient collaborative care is beneficial for preventing hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter and postponing dialysis induction.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference10 articles.
1. Lorenzo V, Martn M, Rufino M, Hernández D, Torres A, Ayus JC. Predialysis nephrologic care and a functioning arteriovenous fistula at entry are associated with better survival in incident hemodialysis patients: an observational cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(6):999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.02.012.
2. Ueno R, Hatta T, Kawasaki Y, Hara M, Otani M, Segawa H, et al. Effect of an educational admission program for patients at the conservative phase of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi. 2013;55(5):956–65.
3. Chen PM, Lai TS, Chen PY, Lai CF, Yang SY, Wu V, et al. Multidisciplinary care program for advanced chronic kidney disease: reduces renal replacement and medical costs. Am J Med. 2015;128(1):68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.07.042.
4. Wang SM, Hsiao LC, Ting IW, Yu TM, Liang CC, Kuo HL, et al. Multidisciplinary care in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2015;26(8):640–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2015.07.002.
5. Abe M, Hatta T, Imamura Y, Sakurada T, Kaname S. Effectiveness and current status of multidisciplinary care for patients with chronic kidney disease in Japan: a nationwide multicenter cohort study. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2023;27(6):528–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10157-023-02338-w.