1. Alarcón López, C., Decuypère, M., Dey, J., Gorur, R., Hamilton, M., Lundahl, C., & Sundström Sjödin, E. (2021). Dancing with Covid: Choreographing examinations in pandemic times. European Educational Research Journal, 20(4), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211022130.
2. Beaulieu, A. (2017). Vectors for fieldwork—Computational thinking and new modes of ethnography. In L. Hjorth, H. A. Horst, A. Galloway, & G. Bell (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital ethnography (pp. 29–39). Routledge.
3. Burrell, J. (2017). The Fieldsite as a Network—Strategy for Locating Ethnographic Research. In L. Hjorth, H. A. Horst, A. Galloway, & G. Bell (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital ethnography (pp. 51–60). New York: Routledge.
4. Callén, B., & Criado, T. S. (2016). Vulnerability Tests. Matters of “Care for Matter” in E-waste Practices. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 6(2), 17–40.
5. Cohn, M. L. (2019). Keeping Software Present: Software as a Timely Object for STS Studies of the Digital. In J. Vertesi, D. Ribes, C. DiSalvo, Y. Loukissas, L. Forlano, D. K. Rosner, S. J. Jackson, & H. R. Shell (Eds.), DigitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies (pp. 423–446). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77mp9.