Automation Is Coming! Exploring Future(s)-Oriented Methods in Education

Author:

Cerratto Pargman Teresa,Lindberg Ylva,Buch Anders

Abstract

Abstract Emerging automated-decision making (ADM) technologies invite scholars to engage with future points in time and contexts that have not yet arisen. This particular state of not knowing yet implies the methodological challenge of examining images of the future and how such images will materialize in practice. In this respect, we ask the following: what are appropriate research methods for studying emerging ADM technologies in education? How do researchers explore sociotechnical practices that are in the making? Guided by these questions, we investigate the increasing adoption of ADM in teachers’ assessment practices. This constitutes a case in point for reflecting on the research methods applied to address the future of assessment in education. In this context, we distinguish between representational methods oriented to recounting past experiences and future(s) methods oriented to making futures. Studying the literature on speculative methods in digital education, we illustrate four categories of future(s)-oriented methods and reflect on their characteristics through a backcasting workshop conducted with teachers. We conclude by discussing the need to reconsider the methodological choices made for studying emerging technologies in critical assessment practices and generate new knowledge on methods able to contribute to alternative imaginaries of automation in education.

Funder

Stockholm University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Education

Reference79 articles.

1. Adams, V., Murphy, M., & Clarke, A. E. (2009). Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity, 28(1), 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.18.

2. Auger, J. (2013). Speculative design: Crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity, 24(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276.

3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large. Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

4. Appadurai, A. (2013). The future as cultural fact: Essays on the global condition. New York: Verso.

5. Atkinson, P. (2015). For Ethnography. London: Sage.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Situating AI in assessment—an exploration of university teachers’ valuing practices;AI and Ethics;2024-09-05

2. Higher education futures at the intersection of justice, hope, and educational technology;International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education;2024-07-02

3. ‘Help!? My students created an evil AI’: on the irony of speculative methods and design fiction;Learning, Media and Technology;2024-06-26

4. Speculative futures for higher education;International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education;2024-06-17

5. Algorithmic Decision Making in Education: Challenges and Opportunities;2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON);2024-05-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3