Abstract
Abstract
Digital education is often presented as breaking from tradition. A failure to account for how digital education emerges from historical institutional activity is problematic insofar as this activity continues to circulate through the present and future, appearing and disappearing in often unexpected ways. Using Derrida’s hauntology as a theoretical lens, this paper traces how a digital education initiative at the University of Edinburgh in 2003 carried through to the creation of a course to train teachers to teach online in 2019, which in turn informed the university’s response to the pandemic in 2020. Working in a broadly autoethnographic way alongside archival document analysis, several findings emerged. First, hauntology provides a mechanism for institutions to trace their own histories and to note how these histories, often hidden in archives or carried forward into the present by hosts, inform their present and future trajectories. Second, broken archives, those that have ceased to function as active repositories but are disconnected from institutional domains and ontologies, shut due to absent gatekeepers, or merely forgotten, contribute to the sudden and often unexpected emergence of hauntings in present and future trajectories. Third, curation of the archive is an act of reinterpretation, one that troubles historical narratives and introduces new hauntings. All these findings assert a re-historicizing of digital education by emphasising the hauntings from the past that inform its emergent present and contested future, countering many of the ahistorical imaginaries of digital education.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Education
Reference61 articles.
1. Adams, C., & Thompson, T.L. (2016). Researching a posthuman world: interviews with digital objects. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Adams, T. E., Ellis, C., & Jones, S. H. (2017). Autoethnography. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0011.
3. Agostinho, D., D'Ignazio, C., Ring, A., Thylstrup, N., & Veel, K. (2019). Uncertain Archives: Approaching the Unknowns, Errors and Vulnerabilities of Big Data through Cultural Theories of the Archive. Surveillance and Society, 17(3/4), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i3/4.12330.
4. Anderson, C., Day, K., Gowans, S., & Macleod, H. (2009). Final Report of The Principal’s E-Learning Fund Evaluation (PELFe). https://www.wiki.ed.ac.uk/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=eLPP&title=PELF+and+Beyond. Accessed 18 July 2022.
5. Anderson, N. (2021) Hauntology: the archive as past and future. In J. Potts (Ed.), Use and Reuse of the Digital Archive. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79523-8_7.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献