Abstract
AbstractDesign is a contested term, and this has implications for designing educational futures. Described through five senses to elucidate its complexity, design can be conceptualised as domain, as process, as plan, as the resulting product, and as the intentional creation of new possibilities. In this paper, we use the five design senses to illustrate how they could be useful for making sense of a large, complex, and multifaceted educational project. We define the design senses as a network of socio-material entanglements and illustrate how actor-network theory can be useful in unpacking this network. Taking a postdigital perspective, we illustrate that in designing for learning in higher education, the relationships between the five senses are fluid, constantly shifting, and emergent in a network of human and non-human actants. We argue that design research needs to move beyond cognitive approaches to the study of collaborative approaches that empower participants. In doing so, our study proposes a co-design approach to designing educational futures where multidisciplinary teams connect their knowledge, skills, and resources to carry out a design task. We present three mini-cases from our co-design project to illustrate how the five senses of design can be used to unpack and untangle the web of complex relationships in co-design. Furthermore, we reflect on the shifting role of educational developers as they lead and participate in co-design teams. We conclude by problematising educational design for designing educational futures in a postdigital world.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Education
Reference34 articles.
1. Abegglen, S., Burns, T., Heller, R., & Sinfield, S. (2023). Designing Educational Futures: Imagine a Collaborative Bloom. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00393-w.
2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bisset, D. (2019). Role of Educational Designers in Higher Education Institutions. In C. Bossu & N. Brown (Eds.), Professional and Support Staff in Higher Education (pp. 1-19). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1607-3_14-1.
4. Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-Structure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them to Do So. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies (pp. 277–303). Boston, MA & London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5. Campbell, K., Schwier, R. A., & Kenny, R. F. (2009). The Critical, Relational Practice of Instructional Design in Higher Education: An Emerging Model of Change Agency. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 645-663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9061-6.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献