RETRACTED ARTICLE: Changes in diagnosis and management of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for underlying malignancy reduce postoperative mortality and improve patient outcome-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Changes in diagnosis and management of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for underlying malignancy reduce postoperative mortality and improve patient outcome

Published:2023-01-24 Issue:2 Volume:55 Page:77-77
ISSN:1682-8631
Container-title:European Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur Surg

Author:

El-Sourani Nader^ORCID,Miftode Sorin,Troja Achim,Alfarawan Fadl,Bockhorn Maximilian

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10353-022-00790-8.pdf

Reference18 articles.

1. Gooszen JAH, Goense L, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105(5):552–60.

2. El-Sourani N, Kechagia C, Alfarawan F, et al. Classification and evaluation of anastomotic leaks after esophageal surgery—A tertiary university experience. Eur Surg. 2022;54:80–5.

3. Schaible A, Brenner T, Hinz U, Schmidt T, Weigand M, Sauer P, Büchler MW, Ulrich A. Significant decrease of mortality due to anastomotic leaks following esophageal resection: Management makes the difference. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402(8):1167–73.

4. Lerut T, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, Van Raemdonck D, Nafteux P, Moons J. Optimizing treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2001;10(4):863–84.

5. Fodor R, Cioc A, Grigorescu B, Lăzescu B, Copotoiu SM. Evaluation of O‑POSSUM vs ASA and APACHE II scores in patients undergoing oesophageal surgery. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015;22(1):7–12.